|
Some of the creepiest
psychological studies of the last few years have come from
Scandinavia. Bloody Angels tries to duplicate the
eeriness of its Norwegian predecessors, Insomnia (which
is being remade by Memento's
Christopher Nolan) and Junk Mail. Though those shoes may
be tough to fill, Angels is still a bitter
disappointment.
Angels
takes place in a tiny rural town where, several months prior to
the film's opening, a young girl with Down's syndrome was
brutally raped and murdered (shades of Paradise Lost?).
The townsfolk believe that the killers are the two oldest sons
of the most despised family in the bleak burg and, as the film
opens, one of the alleged attackers is found dead in an icy
river. His accomplice brother is missing, but nobody in the town
will own up to the obvious retaliation.
Enter an Oslo detective
named Nicholas Ramm (Reidar Sørensen), an old friend of the
stymied local sheriff. Ramm gives new meaning to the term
`no-nonsense cop,' instantly butting heads with the locals, who
insist that they saw `bloody angels' descend from heaven and do
the deed. Hoping to unravel the mystery, Ramm befriends the
tormented younger brother of the suspects (Gaute Skjegstad),
which makes everybody in town hate him even more. Is it really
heavenly intervention, or mob justice? Duh – what do you
think?
The directorial debut of
Karin Julsrud, Angels isn't totally wasted. The music is
downright hair-raising and the cinematography is great, creating
a drab, washed-out look. The weak story (Finn Gjerdrum and
Kjetil Indregard) by is the real problem here, and the ending
should be particularly predictable to anyone that has seen a
Pearl Jam video.
| 1:40 – |
 |
for violence, rape, sexual
content and adult language |
|