|
Let me preface this review by saying I know very little about
The Lord of the Rings trilogy. I
did have the long-playing record of The Hobbit, a much-maligned animated
version of the prequel to Rings made in the late '70s.
But that doesn't mean I wasn't looking as forward to the first film, The
Fellowship of the Ring, as the people who voted J.R.R. Tolkien's books as
the best of the 20th century.
Anyone who regularly
sees movies should be equally as excited.
Already the biggest episodic undertaking since Star
Wars, the trilogy are the first films to be shot
simultaneously (Parts 2 and 3 of both Back to the Future
and the upcoming sequels to The Matrix
are as close as anyone has come).
It took over a year and, depending on who you believe,
between $190 and $400 million to film the three Ring
pictures, which are set to be released at the end of 2001 (Fellowship),
2002 (The Two Towers) and 2003 (The Return of the King).
Fellowship is a
perfect blend of action and fantasy, of special effects and
thoughtful storytelling, and, in a time when the two seem
anything but mutually exclusive, blockbuster juggernaut and
arthouse darling. It's
a shoo-in for multiple Academy Award nominations for its
incredible technical package, which is probably the best and
most detailed since Titanic. People may scoff at the notion of James Cameron carefully
replicating the silverware aboard the doomed ship, or of Fellowship's
Peter Jackson wasting time with the authenticity of the swords
in his film, but, for some reason, it works incredibly well.
Fellowship starts
with a brief yet breakneck explanation of the origin of the ring
that weaves its way through the three Tolkien novels.
It seems that long ago (although not in a faraway galaxy)
19 powerful rings were created and distributed to the various
peoples of a place called Middle Earth.
But one additional ring -- a master to the other 19 --
was also secretly fashioned. Its possessor could control the
other rings and, presumably, anything else he or she desired.
The ring changed hands a
couple of times, ultimately being discovered by Bilbo Baggins
(the hero of my long-playing record), a hobbit who held on to it
for 60 years without realizing what he had.
On the evening of his 111th birthday, Bilbo (From
Hell's Ian Holm), operating on the advice of wizard
Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen, X-Men),
passes the ring to cousin Frodo (Elijah Wood, Black
and White). Gandalf,
you see, knows the evil potential of the ring and, after doing
some digging, discovers its long-dead former owner is regaining
strength, though he can't yet take human form.
Yeah, that bit sounds a
lot like Voldemort from Harry
Potter (as does the incident with the cave troll).
And there isn't much difference between Fellowship
and much of what happens in Star Wars, either. As shameful as it may seem, it's hard not to think about how
derivative Fellowship's story is, even though Tolkien's
book predates the birth of George Lucas and J.K. Rowling by
decades. The rest
of the film, which depicts Frodo and his titular fellowship of
eight other various creatures (hobbit, human, elf, wizard and
dwarf) embarking upon a journey to destroy the ring in the fire
of the appropriately named Mount Doom, isn't anything but a road
trip. A really
bumpy, increasingly frightening road trip with bad guys scary
enough to give adults nightmares for weeks.
Jackson, who directs,
produces, co-wrote the screenplay and I think appears as a drunk
in Fellowship's bar scene, confirms the brilliance
displayed in his Oscar-nominated Heavenly Creatures, and,
if possible, a little bit more.
The trilogy is a huge undertaking, but Jackson clearly is
in full command of his craft.
It was downright shocking to learn he used a crew
comprised of mostly Australians and New Zealanders with no big
feature-film experience. Even
if you ignore the slick post-production special effects and the
oft-copied story, you have to admire Jackson's incredible
attention to detail, whether its keeping the size of the
characters in perspective, or letting his main elf walk on top
of hip-deep snow while the others are forced to trudge through
it.
Back in July, I got my
mitts on a copy of the first episode of television's 24
and, after being dazzled by it (twice), began moaning and
griping about having to wait several months to find out what
happened. You'll
get the same feeling from Fellowship, only you'll have to
wait 12 months instead of a few. The film, like The Empire Strikes Back, ends with
absolutely no resolution, simply because it can. It's simultaneously frustrating and cool.
So let's sum it all up:
Fellowship is wonderful, and though its story is
something we've all seen before, it's one of the best films of
the year. Will it
please fans of the book? I
think so. Will it
make a ton of money? You
bet. Will it factor
into the Oscar race? Yes. Do you need to be familiar with the story to see the film?
Absolutely not. Will it be bigger and better than Episode Two?
It's too early to tell, but Fellowship doesn't
have a Jar-Jar Binks, so it's got an early lead.
| 2:58
– |
 |
for
epic battle sequences and some scary images |
|