|
The
Maturation of David Cronenberg enters Stage II with the
director’s A History of Violence which, along with Stage
I offering (Spider), has seen
the Canadian leap from shock-and-awe filmmaking (Crash,
eXistenZ, Videodrome, etc.) to crafting something
that can easily stand among the best pictures of the year. It’s
a little like the enfant terrible-to-auteur metamorphosis
experienced by François Ozon as of late, only Cronenberg is
about three decades further away from being l’enfant than
Ozon
is.
Distributed in wide
release, presumably because its lead was in The
Lord of the Rings, Violence is set in Millbrook, Indiana, where
Tom Stall (Hidalgo’s Viggo Mortensen) is living
the perfect idyllic life of Norman Rockwell-esque Midwest America. His wife,
Edie (Maria Bello), is devoted and hot, and his two children (Ashton Holmes and
Heidi Hayes) are adorable and well-adjusted. He also runs the town’s diner,
which is where a pair of murderous thugs wander in and have an Oprah-at-Hermes
kind of snit when Tom tells them it’s too late in the evening to serve them.
Words are exchanged, guns are drawn, and before you know it, Tom actually turns
into Charles Bronson and wastes both of the baddies.
The incident and its
subsequent media frenzy turn Tom into a reluctant hero, but they also draw the
attention of Philly crime boss Carl Fogarty (Ed Harris), who believes Tom is
really an on-the-run-from-the-mob guy named Joey Cusack. Like Henry Fonda in
Alfred Hitchcock’s The Wrong Man, Tom insists Carl is simply confusing
him with someone else. Is Tom really Joey? Is the partially blind Carl mixed
up? Maybe Tom has some kind of weird split-personality? That’s for you, dear
readers, to find out, though you should be warned that the titular violence is
sporadic but pretty fricking unspeakable.
Violence’s
story was adapted by art department underling-turned-screenwriter Josh Olson
from the relatively sparse black-and-white graphic novel written by Judge
Dredd creator John Wagner. Olson adds some scenes that nicely aid the
film’s character development, and others that don’t seem to do much other than
pad the already-meager 96-minute running time. The greatest injustice of all,
however, is that Olson completely jettisons the novel’s second act and
drastically re-writes the third. Normally, this wouldn’t bother me too much, so
long as the end-result was as enjoyable and well-realized as Violence
is. But, and this is going to be difficult to explain without getting
into spoiler territory, the things that happen in the second act make Tom a much
more sympathetic character, and their absence hinder the end result somewhat.
Cronenberg’s direction is
as crisp as ever, beginning with a really nice opening scene: A five-plus minute
tone-setter filmed entirely in one shot. Mortensen, with graying hair and a
soft-spoken voice, almost makes you forget about how much of a nerd Aragorn can
really be (and speaking of tranquility, the whole production is surprisingly
quiet, which only makes the spurts of violence that much more shocking). The
glue holding the picture together is Bello, whose range of emotions expressed as
a result of Tom’s situation are the real driving force of Violence, and
the best work I’ve ever seen from the Golden Globe/SAG nominee for the overrated
The Cooler.
Violence
reminded me a lot of Sam Mendes’ adaptation of
Road to Perdition, mostly because both pictures were based on graphic
novels about a family man from the Midwest putting the lives of his loved ones
in jeopardy because of his (potential) involvement in Irish-led organized crime,
but also in tone, as well (I won’t bother mentioning the uncanny connection
between both movie’s “godfathers,” played by the father-son team from Empire
Falls). I do not, however, think mainstream audiences are ready for
something like Violence, if the non-stop snickering (mostly at the
unconventional opening, the hot but non-explicit sex scenes between Mortensen
and Bello, and the finale) heard at my preview screening was any indication.
That this picture and Roman Polanski’s Oliver Twist
both open this week in multiplexes across the country speaks volumes about the
current state of the film industry.
|
1:39 – |
 |
for strong brutal
violence, graphic sexuality, nudity, language and some
drug use |
|