|
It's been a decade since the
bafflingly popular Merchant-Ivory team has churned out anything
I could even remotely recommend to friends and family.
Since Remains of the Day, director/co-writer James
Ivory, producer Ismail Merchant and screenwriter Ruth Prawer
Jhabvala have made a couple of really awful pictures (Jefferson
in Paris and Surviving Picasso), as well as one that
left me completely unaffected (A Soldier's Daughter Never
Cries) and one I couldn't even bring myself to watch (The
Golden Bowl).
Granted, theirs is an
acquired taste – one needs to be into stuffy adaptations of
stuffy novels full of stuffy characters. But with Le Divorce,
which is based on Diane Johnson's 1997 bestseller, M-I ups the
stakes by allowing the immensely untalented Kate Hudson to front
the proceedings (If you want a really good laugh, read the
interview where she calls Americans “annoying, boisterous
creatures.” Hello, Kettle? Pot
here. You're black). From
the looks of the trailer and the poster, one might get the
impression Hudson was sharing top billing with Naomi Watts, but
sadly, that is not the case.
Le Divorce would have been instantly stronger if
the casting were reversed, or if those roles were cast as
originally intended (with Natalie Portman and Winona Ryder).
Divorce almost
feels as if someone took pieces of a dozen different films and
tried to patch them together in an attempt to make an
avant-garde art project. There
are enough threads to fill two seasons of a typical television
drama, but none of them are interesting or fleshed out enough to
work here. The
focal point of the picture is two families – one American and
one French. Watts (The
Ring) is Roxeanne, a poet from Santa Barbara who lives
in Paris and is married to painter Charles-Henri (Melvil Poupaud).
He leaves her for a Russian dancer (Rona Harter) just as
her younger sister Isabel (Hudson, Alex & Emma)
arrives in town to care for the pregnant Roxeanne.
While in Paris, Isabel
embarks on affairs with two different men.
One is the bohemian handyman/dog walker (Romain Duris) of
another American expatriate poet (Glenn Close channeling the
late Colleen Dewhurst); the other is an ultra right-wing
politician (Thierry Lhermitte) who happens to be Charles-Henri's
uncle. During
Roxeanne's divorce proceedings, which make France seem like it's
run by the Taliban, Charles-Henri's family, led by matriarch
Suzanne (Leslie Caron, Chocolat),
tries to get their grubby mitts on a potentially valuable
painting that was handed down to Isabel, Roxeanne and brother
Roger (Thomas Lennon) by their parents (Stockard Channing and
Sam Waterston). Somewhere in this mix, Bebe Neuwirth and Stephen
Frye pop up as art appraisers, and Matthew Modine occasionally
appears to act spastic.
So there are a lot of
characters, but none of them are sympathetic, let alone the
leads. Roxeanne is
a professional doormat, and Isabel becomes the fuck bunny for
someone already trying to screw over her family (The scene where
she shops for bras is irritating, too – it's like watching
Linda Hunt browse for clothes in the Big & Tall shop).
I can't remember the last film I saw with so little focus
(Oh, wait – I remember now.
It was Gigli).
Divorce is scattered and disjointed, and at the
end it expects the audience to swallow a big mouthful of pseudo-Amélie
charm (right around the same time Hudson's character starts to
narrate the heretofore narrator-free movie – the sure sign of
an editing room Hail Mary).
Stereotypes and faux
sophistication abound, though Divorce does feature one
slightly funny line. When
Roxeanne finds out France's Draconian divorce laws aren't
exactly looking out for her best interests, she shouts, “I
can't believe I'm trapped in a novel by Balzac!”
Hey, try being trapped in an audience full of people who
can't believe they're trapped in a theatre watching someone
complain about being trapped in a novel by Balzac.
| 1:57
– |
 |
for
mature thematic elements and sexual content |
|