|
I’m all
for people attempting to make Shakespeare more accessible to the
masses, but I draw the line at Love’s Labour’s Lost.
Kenneth Branagh’s fourth adaptation of the Bard (four
and a half if you count A Midwinter’s Tale) tries to do
way too much with what is arguably Shakespeare’s weakest play.
There are
several things a filmmaker can do to liven up Shakespeare and
make his work more appealing to Betty and Ron Normalson of
Wheeling, West Virginia. The
first and most obvious is changing the setting, like in Michael
Almereyda’s inspiring new version of Hamlet, which
takes place in present-day New York City.
An ambitious filmmaker can even raise an eyebrow by
casting acting talent that you wouldn’t normally associate
with Shakespeare, like Branagh did with 1993’s Much Ado
About Nothing, which featured Denzel Washington and the
Razzie-nominated Keanu Reeves.
Branagh does
both of these here, as Lost is set in pre-World War II
Navarre, a small county outside of France, and features
performances from borderline Gen-Y talents Alicia Silverstone (Blast
From the Past) and Matthew Lillard (S.L.C. Punk).
But things go awry by the presence of about ten
song-and-dance numbers from the likes of Irving Berlin, Cole
Porter, Rogers & Hammerstein and the Gershwin brothers.
And when the characters aren’t singing, they’re
wrapped up in what appears to be a zany screwball comedy from
the ‘30s, full of silly pratfalls, double-takes and
exaggerated, slack-jawed facial expressions.
There’s a reason that vaudeville died, but nobody seems
to have told Branagh.
The story is
about The King of Navarre (Alessandro Nivola, Timecode)
and his three horny buddies, Berowne (Branagh), Longaville (Lillard)
and Dumaine (Adrian Lester, Primary Colors), who decide
that war is for sissies and make an agreement to hole up for
three years, depriving themselves of women, food and sleep to
study philosophy. Their
plans are interrupted by the arrival of a French princess (Silverstone)
and her three horny friends Rosaline (Natascha McElhone, Ronin),
Maria (Carmen Ejogo, The Avengers) and Katherine (Emily
Mortimer, Scream 3).
They sing, they dance, they fall in love, and I went
home. End of story.
Oh, and then I had lunch.
There are
also a lot of annoying supporting roles that made me want to
leave the theatre and run over someone’s dog.
Each actor seemed to be in a contest to see who could
“out-ham” the next, and as a result, Lost plays like
a silly parody. But
I don’t think it’s supposed to be, which just makes the
whole thing laughably sad.
Particularly annoying are Nathan Lane (Isn’t She
Great) and Timothy Spall, the latter of whom was so likeable
in Topsy-Turvy.
I’ve heard
people complain about the quality of the singing and the dancing
of the actors, but I thought it was pretty commendable, with
Lester a notable standout.
It’s certainly a lot better than I could do, or would
even be willing to do. It’s
a risky move that unfortunately doesn’t pay off here.
Branagh
deserves credit for his ambition, but little else.
He’s been nominated for three Oscars (writing and
acting) in his Shakespeare adaptations, but only when he sticks
to the serious plays (Hamlet and Henry V).
Most of Hamlet’s crew is on board here as well,
with cinematographer Alex Thomson, editor Neil Farrell,
production designer Tim Harvey and composer Patrick Doyle (who
was nominated for Hamlet) contributing to the overall
look, feel and sound of a ‘30s musical.
1:33
-
for sensuality and a brief drug reference
|