|
A
film like this rarely lives up to its hype.
First, it’s the sequel to a movie that took in over
$180 million domestically and over $420 worldwide in 1996.
Helming the project is arguably the greatest shoot-‘em-up
director of all-time, and the screenplay was written by a
four-time Oscar nominee. Its
acting lead is one of the world’s biggest stars, who is only a
few months removed from his third Oscar nod.
Heck, there’s even an unbilled Oscar winner thrown for
good measure. And
then there’s the little matter of every other potential summer
blockbuster cutting a wide path around the film’s May 24th
release date.
Sadly,
M:I-2 doesn’t live up to the hype.
I’m not saying it’s bad (although everybody else in
the theatre seemed to think so) – just disappointing.
Believe me, I was pulling for it to set the action film
standard for the next four or five years, like M:I-2
director John Woo’s Face/Off did in 1997.
While M:I-2 is better than the last couple James
Bond flicks, it struggles to even duplicate the level of
entertainment created by the first M:I film.
It’s still entertaining and fun, in a
check-your-brain-at-the-box-office kind of way.
Tom
Cruise (Magnolia) returns as Ethan Hunt, IMF (Impossible
Missions Force) pointman, who, as the film opens, has his
rock-climbing vacation interrupted by an emergency summons to
Seville, Spain, where the IMF boss (played by an uncredited
Anthony Hopkins, Titus) dispatches him to apprehend a
malevolent Scotsman (shades of Fat Bastard?) that has designs on
threatening the world with a deadly virus called Chimera.
To
complete his mission, Hunt nabs M:I’s only other
holdover in Luther Stickell (Ving Rhames, Bringing out the
Dead), as well as a wisecracking agent played by Aussie
actor John Polson (The Boys).
Hunt is also instructed to recruit the services of a
civilian master thief named Nyah Nordoff-Hall (Thandie Newton, Besieged),
who also happens to be an ex-lover of Sean Ambrose (Dougray
Scott, Ever After), the IMF's target.
Hunt and Nyah become soulmates after about thirty seconds
of contact, at which point M:I-2 becomes slightly
derailed by a lot of unnecessary, vomit-inducing romance,
including a really corny line that I think may have been stolen
from Michael Mann's The Last of the Mohicans.
Like
the original M:I film, the sequel is full of
double-crossing via rubber masks, which look a lot cooler here
than they did four years ago, thanks to advancements in CGI.
There are also some nifty gadgets, such as a satellite
that can capture detailed video of anyone in the world.
And like Face/Off (or any Woo film), there’s
plenty of double-fisted gunplay, birds taking flight, martial
arts, slow-motion action, and a chase scene that goes on for a
bit too long (it was boats in Face/Off and it's
motorcycles here). That
is to say, there’s plenty of this stuff in the last fifteen
minutes. The rest
of the film is pretty light on all of the exciting things that
you would expect from Woo.
In fact, Woo fans will probably be bitterly disappointed,
but then again, they have slightly unreal expectations because
of the director’s previous work.
M:I-2
has a plot so convoluted that they have the bad guy narrate
what’s happening during one sequence, and it will still leave
you scratching your head (people complained that the first film
was too hard to follow, which is probably why they tried to add
the explanation here). Hey,
this isn’t Chinatown (which screenwriter Robert Towne
also penned) - it’s an action flick, implying that there
should be action throughout the film, and not just the last
fifteen minutes.
Another
big problem is with Scott, who overacts so badly that I thought
he was doing a bad Scottish accent (turns out he’s actually
from Scotland). He’s
certainly not physically intimidating, and he damn well isn’t
creepy enough to pull off a “psychological madman”-type
role, like Alan Rickman in Die Hard, or even Robert
Carlyle in The World is Not Enough.
Is he evil? Maybe. Is he diabolical? Definitely
not. Ambrose
doesn’t come off any more threatening than anybody else with a
sneer and an accent.
Cruise
is simply adequate and, apparently, too short to don the flowing
black trenchcoat usually worn by the lead actors in Woo’s
films (see Nic Cage in Face/Off or Chow Yun-Fat in
anything). While M:I-2
has added the romantic angle, Cruise’s character has become a
little more human, but there still isn’t much to like about
Ethan Hunt, other than hearing Rhames call him “Efan”
instead of “Ethan.” In
short (sorry, Tom), M:I-2 is ridiculously unbelievable,
which is something that every entertaining action flick should
be. But it should
have been so much better.
2:08
–
for violence, sexual content and adult language
|