| Mel
Gibsons latest action vehicle is Payback,
a terribly violent, terribly choppy film
thats, well, just plain terrible.
Armed with the expectation of seeing
Gibson in the rare role of a bad guy,
viewers will instead find every other
character so unimaginatively despicable
that Gibson will still emerge smelling
like a rose. But more on that later.
First, a little history
Payback
was actually filmed a while ago by
first-time director Brian Helgeland, last
years Oscar winner for Best Adapted
Screenplay (L.A. Confidential) and
the writer of Gibsons 1997 action
blockbuster Conspiracy Theory.
Reportedly, Gibson was so unhappy with
the finished product that he convinced
the studio to jettison Helgeland out of
the editing room, leaving Gibson to make
the final cut himself. Now, mind you,
this shouldnt be like Jean-Claude
Van Damme suddenly gaining control of a
film Gibson is, after all,
an Oscar-winning director (Braveheart).
But sadly, it is.
Gibson
plays Porter, an ex-Marine turned hoodlum
that has just scored $70,000 by robbing a
Chinese money-laundering syndicate. His
heroin-addicted wife (Deborah Kara Unger,
The Game) double-crosses him after
the heist, leaving Porter with two ugly
bullet holes in his back while
Porters pilfering partner makes off
with all of the loot, planning to use it
to join a mysterious group called
"The Outfit."
In
order to get his $70,000 back, Porter
starts at the bottom of the crime world
(David Paymer) and works his way to the
head of The Outfit (Kris Kristofferson),
meeting many zany characters along the
way. He also gets back together with
Rosie (Maria Bello, Permanent Midnight
[and now 0 for 2 in film since leaving ER]),
his girlfriend who also happens to be a
whore controlled by The Outfit. The only
other female in Payback is an
Asian hooker with a specialty in
sadomasochism. So, for those of you women
keeping track at home, thats two
whores and a junkie. And the three of
them are routinely beaten by whichever
male character happens to be in the scene
with them. Hey, youve come a long
way, baby!
Early
into the picture, in one of the only
pleasing scenes, we see a beat-up and
penniless Porter stealing $3 from a
panhandler and parlaying it into a new
suit, a new gun and several hundred
dollars by simply pick-pocketing and
leaving lousy tips. The film is also
accented by Porters sporadic,
gravel-voiced narrations that seem
haphazardly thrown in just to make the
awkward scenes blend together better.
There are also several scenes that run
out of sequence; again, probably due to
Gibsons attempt to salvage his
project. For his $20 million fee, he
could have offered to do a lot more.
As an
added bonus, every frame of Payback
seems to be bathed in blue light. You may
have seen the style before in television
commercials or your favorite music
videos. I have no idea what this means.
Is it a metaphor for the cheerless
downcasts that the film portrays? Or is
it symbolic of its crude, distasteful
content? Maybe cinematographer (Ericson
Core, 187) just likes the color
blue. It would have been better served if
used just for the flashback scenes. Or
not at all.
Helgeland
also co-wrote the bland script with Terry
Hayes, who scripted Gibsons last
two Mad Max films. It was based on
Donald E. Westlakes novel "The
Hunter" which he wrote under the
pseudonym Richard Stark. Helgeland and
Hayes should have used pseudonyms as
well. Their story is as boring as it is
formulaic, and its unnecessary graphic
violence and obscenity-laced dialogue
often induced my fellow viewers into
uncomfortable laughter and, I swear to
God, audible wincing.
Payback
and Gibsons Porter are best summed
up by the genius that sat behind me, who,
in one particularly ridiculous scene,
exclaimed, "Man, hes
whack!" Whack, indeed.
1:44 - for graphic violence and
lewd language
|