|
There are two relatively
big films opening today in limited release. They're called
Beyond the Sea and The
Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (you can read reviews by
clicking on the titles).
We
didn't bother with Blade: Trinity, mostly because we
didn't bother seeing Blade II: The Bitening.
There isn’t really a
whole lot to say about Ocean’s
Twelve. It
features the same cast, the same crew, the same budget, and
nearly the same story as the 2001 blockbuster-remake.
If you liked Ocean’s
Eleven, you’re going to like this version, as well.
Twelve,
featuring just about every actor in Hollywood who wasn’t in Closer (and one who was), is set a few
years after Danny Ocean (George Clooney, Intolerable
Cruelty) and his pals swiped $160 million dollars from a
casino run by the slimy Terry Benedict (Andy Garcia, Twisted).
Ocean, who also managed to steal Benedict’s girlfriend
Tess (Julia Roberts, Closer),
has been busy trying to resume to a normal, crime-free life in
New England. That
plan doesn’t last long, however, as Ocean and his old mates
from the Bellagio con all have threatening encounters with
Benedict, who was tipped to their roles in the casino heist by a
mysterious European with ulterior (and, admittedly, pretty
stupid) motives. The
rub: Pay back what was stolen, plus a handsome vig, and you
won’t be hunted down and killed like an animal.
Because Ocean’s crew
is still too hot to work in the States, they head for Europe
and, after a lot of trickery, decide to steal the Fabergé
coronation egg from a museum.
But the egg may as well have been a maguffin (mmmmm…
Fabergé egg maguffin…).
Some heist films are about, you know, the heist.
This one isn’t. It’s
about the characters, or some might even say the people playing
those characters. This
time around, we learn more about Rusty (Brad Pitt, Troy),
who apparently had a fling with the very same Europol agent
(Catherine Zeta-Jones, The
Terminal) who is trying to prevent him and his buddies
from making off with the egg maguffin.
The highlights here –
aside from Steven Soderbergh (Solaris)
and his colored filters, fun jump-cuts and usual directorial
flare – are the inside jokes.
Some are casually mentioned (like the Topher Grace cameo
– see below), but one is a fairly
integral thread to the plot.
It comes from so far past left field, it blindsided me to
the point where I’ll need to see Twelve again to enjoy some of the jokes I missed while trying to
pick my jaw up off of the floor.
Like Soderbergh’s Full
Frontal, he and screenwriter George Nolfi (Timeline)
manipulate the “fourth wall” to the point where you’re not
sure it even exists any longer.
Twelve’s
finale could use some tightening (the scene featuring Cassel
working his way through the laser beam security system was a bit
much, but I understand the intended juxtaposition) in an attempt
to keep the running time from exceeding two hours.
But it’s still a fun, escapist ride that won’t make
you feel dirty and foolish.
Like National Treasure did.
.
In Ocean’s
Twelve, Topher Grace has a cameo where he laments his
career choices, specifically how he totally phoned in his role
in “the Dennis Quaid film.” The
picture he’s referring to, which I saw just 12 hours after Twelve,
is In
Good Company, the latest from Paul and Chris Weitz (About
a Boy).
Don’t let Company’s
late-December release date fool you: This isn’t one of those
Oscar-quality projects that are dropped into theatres after
Christmas just to qualify for this year’s awards season.
It’s a predictable, pedestrian dud – one of those
films in which nothing happens that a person with even
low-to-moderate brain activity can’t figure out in the first
five minutes. What’s
worse, Company’s
story preaches the evils that are big corporate behemoths, and
shows the havok wreaked by business mergers and takeovers.
You wouldn’t expect a picture with that kind of message
to be filled with what might be the year’s most obvious
product placement, would you?
Expect it if you see Company,
which happens to be financed and distributed by an enormous
conglomerate.
Dennis Quaid (The
Day After Tomorrow) plays Dan Foreman, the 51-year-old head
of advertising sales for a popular sports magazine.
When the magazine’s parent company is taken over by
GlobeCom, Dan is demoted and discovers his new boss is Carter
Duryea (Grace, p.s.),
a 26-year-old corporate ass-kisser, has absolutely no experience
with sports magazines or ad sales.
Dan has other troubles, as well.
His wife (Marg Helgenberger, CSI:
Topeka) is knocked up, and his daughter (Scarlett Johansson,
A
Love Song for Bobby Long), is transferring from state
school to the less tuition-friendly NYU.
These added financial burdens make Dan increasingly more
and more anxious as he wonders if his position will be
eliminated by the smarmy, buzzword-spouting Carter.
Carter, meanwhile, lives
in an expensive but extremely cold-looking modern home with his
wife of seven months (Selma Blair, A
Dirty Shame). But
she leaves Carter because he pays more attention to work than
her. This renders
Carter, who is already in over his head in his new position,
rather helpless and looking for guidance in both his
professional and personal life.
Wonder if he’ll find it in…I don’t know…Dan?
Maybe Carter will even strike up a relationship with
Dan’s daughter? Maybe
she’ll set him on the straight and narrow?
Maybe everything will end happily?
Check, check and check.
Company
is, I think, meant to be an Oscar vehicle for Quaid, but his
performance, while admirable in that he’s playing his age,
just isn’t that strong compared to the pool of likely nominees
(Giamatti, Carrey, Foxx, Depp, Hanks, DiCaprio, Bacon).
While not exactly “called in,” Grace isn’t nearly
as effective here as he was in p.s.
or even Win a Date With Tad Hamilton!.
Even Johansson fails to flourish with the weak material.
File this one under Wait for DVD.
And even then, you might want to wait a little more.
.
A Love Song for Bobby Long is the feature film debut from
Shainee Gabel, who adapts the story from Ronald Everett
Capps’s novel Off
Magazine Street. Like
In
Good Company (which is being dropped the same day), this
picture features both Scarlett Johansson and a 50-year-old guy
in what is supposed to be an “awards worthy” performance.
The guy here is John Travolta, and his role would be
meaty Oscar stuff in the hands of a number of actors, but
Travolta just ain’t one of them.
His turn is valiant, but ultimately transparent.
But, that said, he does dance in it, and all of
Travolta’s legendary comebacks revolve around him having a big
dance scene.
Johansson is Purceline
Will, the epitome of Florida trailer trash who ditches her days
of watching television and eating peanut butter and M&Ms
with a spoon when she finds out her estranged mother has died in
New Orleans. Because
her stupid boyfriend didn’t give her the message about mom’s
funeral on time, Purcy shows up a day late and discovers she’s
inherited a portion of the family’s dilapidated house, as well
as its equally ramshackle inhabitants: Drunk, quote-spouting
ex-professor Bobby Long (Travolta, Ladder
49) and his writing protégé, the far-from-sober Lawson
Pines (Gabriel Macht, The
Recruit).
The drunks plan to make
Purcy miserable enough to ditch them and the house so they can
mix alcohol and pickle juice in private.
But Purcy’s infectious attitude – which, at some
point, has made the giant leap from couch potato to aspiring
x-ray technician – wins over as she gets the Ben Sanderson
wannabes to give up the sauce and turn their lives around.
Oh, and did I mention that Purcy never knew her dad, and
that the curmudgeon we call Bobby never really knew his kids?
Those two will be, literally, the only two people in the
theatre who can’t see the end of this film coming from a mile
away.
On
the plus side, Song is
shot well and looks pretty (it’s photographed by ex-Soderbergh
lenser Elliot Davis), and it gives Johansson a chance to show a
little bit of range. Not
much, but way more than Company
or The Perfect Score. I
thought Macht was effective in a subtler, better way than
Travolta. And I
wished that Song had the touch of David Gordon Green, and that Gabel didn’t
change Purcy’s mom from a morbidly obese mental patient to an
attractive, moderately successful lounge singer.
.
I caught Takeshi
Kitano’s Dolls two years ago at a
film festival, and frankly, forgot it existed soon thereafter
(it happens with a lot of festival fare).
Kitano made another film since then (2004’s The
Blind Swordsman: Zatoichi) and turned up in younger form
via Most Extreme Elimination Challenge, which did nothing but push Dolls
further from my memory. But
now, thanks to Palm Pictures, Dolls
is finally receiving a North American release, possibly to
capitalize on the hotter-than-hot “puppet film” genre
recently blitzkrieged by Team
America: World Police (budget: $30 million; gross $32
million).
See, Dolls
is, at least in part, a bunraku film, complete with puppeteers
manipulating wooden creations through stories of love and
redemption. A really slow story
of love and redemption. One
that Kitano directs and edits, but does not appear in and did
not write (a first for both).
After
a quick check of the notes I took during my screening of Dolls,
I remembered sleeping through most of it.
The one legible entry says, “When I came to, two-thirds
of the previously packed house had left, and the few that
remained were either in Slumberland, or muttering to themselves
about why they hadn’t left yet.”
I know that’s not much of a review, but it’s all
I’ve got.
.
Next
week: Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events, Spanglish,
Million Dollar Baby, The Aviator, The Woodsman,
The Sea Inside, and possibly, if we can stomach it, The
Phantom of the Opera.
|